Aphrodite 25 vs Kelt 7.6
How do the Aphrodite 25 and Kelt 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aphrodite 25 
Kelt 7.6 | Aphrodite 25 | Kelt 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 9.4 ft2.88 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 4,409 lb2,000 kg | 4,188 lb1,900 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 1,631 lb740 kg |
| Sail area | 366 ft²34.0 m² | 273 ft²25.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.78 | 16.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 194 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.3 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.34 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €7,000 | — |
Aphrodite 25 vs Kelt 7.6: the short version
- The Aphrodite 25 and Kelt 7.6 are close in length (24.9 ft7.60 m vs 24.9 ft7.60 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Aphrodite 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Aphrodite 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Aphrodite 25 rates better for offshore work (2.28 vs 2.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.