Aphrodite 25 vs Storfidra
How do the Aphrodite 25 and Storfidra compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aphrodite 25 | Aphrodite 25 | Storfidra | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 4.2 ft1.29 m |
| Displacement | 4,409 lb2,000 kg | 6,834 lb3,100 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Sail area | 366 ft²34.0 m² | 258 ft²24.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.78 | 11.46 |
| Displacement / Length | 194 | 345 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.3 | 30.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 1.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €7,000 | €2,200 |
Aphrodite 25 vs Storfidra: the short version
- The Aphrodite 25 and Storfidra are close in length (24.9 ft7.60 m vs 24.9 ft7.60 m ).
- The Storfidra is heavier, displacing about 55% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Aphrodite 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 11.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Storfidra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Storfidra rates better for offshore work (1.66 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.