Bayfield 25 vs Bayfield 29
How do the Bayfield 25 and Bayfield 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bayfield 25 
Bayfield 29 | Bayfield 25 | Bayfield 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 21.8 ft6.63 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 7,100 lb3,221 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 289 ft²26.8 m² | 420 ft²39.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.06 | 18.19 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 308 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 20.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.2 |
Bayfield 25 vs Bayfield 29: the short version
- The Bayfield 29 is the larger boat at 29.0 ft8.84 m LOA versus 25.0 ft7.62 m for the Bayfield 25.
- The Bayfield 29 is heavier, displacing about 103% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bayfield 25 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 18.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bayfield 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bayfield 25 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.