Bayfield 25 vs Bremer 25
How do the Bayfield 25 and Bremer 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bayfield 25 
Bremer 25 | Bayfield 25 | Bremer 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 6.2 ft1.88 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 3,800 lb1,724 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 289 ft²26.8 m² | 310 ft²28.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.06 | 20.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 149 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 15.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.4 |
Bayfield 25 vs Bremer 25: the short version
- The Bayfield 25 and Bremer 25 are close in length (25.0 ft7.62 m vs 25.0 ft7.62 m ).
- The Bremer 25 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bremer 25 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 20.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bayfield 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bremer 25 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.