Bluejacket 23 vs Paceship 23
How do the Bluejacket 23 and Paceship 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket 23 
Paceship 23 | Bluejacket 23 | Paceship 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.8 ft6.96 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 202 ft²18.8 m² | 225 ft²20.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.36 | 20.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 167 | 150 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.1 | 11.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.42 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Bluejacket 23 vs Paceship 23: the short version
- The Bluejacket 23 and Paceship 23 are close in length (22.8 ft6.96 m vs 23.0 ft7.01 m ).
- The Paceship 23 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.7 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bluejacket 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bluejacket 23 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.