Bluejacket 23 vs Paceship PY 23
How do the Bluejacket 23 and Paceship PY 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bluejacket 23 
Paceship PY 23 | Bluejacket 23 | Paceship PY 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.8 ft6.96 m | 22.6 ft6.88 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 19.8 ft6.02 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 2,460 lb1,116 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 945 lb429 kg |
| Sail area | 202 ft²18.8 m² | 225 ft²20.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.36 | 19.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 167 | 143 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.1 | 11.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.37 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 6.0 |
Bluejacket 23 vs Paceship PY 23: the short version
- The Bluejacket 23 and Paceship PY 23 are close in length (22.8 ft6.96 m vs 22.6 ft6.88 m ).
- The Paceship PY 23 is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bluejacket 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 19.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bluejacket 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bluejacket 23 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.37).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.