ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 46 Mk I
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 46 Mk I compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 46 Mk I | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 46 Mk I | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 37.9 ft11.55 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 37.9 ft11.55 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 14.5 ft4.41 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 31,306 lb14,200 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 11,400 lb5,171 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 978 ft²90.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 15.75 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 257 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 36.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 8.2 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 46 Mk I: the short version
- The Swan 46 Mk I is the larger boat at 37.9 ft11.55 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.29 m for the ClubSwan 42.
- The Swan 46 Mk I is heavier, displacing about 86% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 46 Mk I scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 46 Mk I rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.