ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 441
How do the ClubSwan 42 and Swan 441 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 42 
Swan 441 | ClubSwan 42 | Swan 441 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 36.8 ft11.20 m |
| Waterline length | 37.0 ft11.29 m | 36.8 ft11.20 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.93 m | 13.3 ft4.06 m |
| Draft | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 16,865 lb7,650 kg | 24,692 lb11,200 kg |
| Ballast | 7,046 lb3,196 kg | 11,000 lb4,990 kg |
| Sail area | 1,176 ft²109.3 m² | 1,248 ft²115.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.61 | 23.55 |
| Displacement / Length | 148 | 222 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.4 | 33.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 8.1 |
ClubSwan 42 vs Swan 441: the short version
- The ClubSwan 42 and Swan 441 are close in length (37.0 ft11.29 m vs 36.8 ft11.20 m ).
- The Swan 441 is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 42 carries the more powerful rig (28.6 vs 23.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 441 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 441 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.