COM-PAC 19 vs Com-Pac Horizon Cat
How do the COM-PAC 19 and Com-Pac Horizon Cat compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
COM-PAC 19 
Com-Pac Horizon Cat | COM-PAC 19 | Com-Pac Horizon Cat | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 16.3 ft4.98 m | 17.8 ft5.41 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Ballast | 800 lb363 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 153 ft²14.2 m² | 205 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.42 | 17.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 200 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.3 | 12.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.6 |
COM-PAC 19 vs Com-Pac Horizon Cat: the short version
- The COM-PAC 19 and Com-Pac Horizon Cat are close in length (20.1 ft6.12 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-Pac Horizon Cat carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The COM-PAC 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the COM-PAC 19 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.