COM-PAC 19 vs Com-Pac Eclipse
How do the COM-PAC 19 and Com-Pac Eclipse compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
COM-PAC 19 
Com-Pac Eclipse | COM-PAC 19 | Com-Pac Eclipse | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 16.3 ft4.98 m | 18.1 ft5.51 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.3 ft2.23 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 5.2 ft1.57 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Ballast | 800 lb363 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | 153 ft²14.2 m² | 158 ft²14.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.42 | 14.94 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 166 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.3 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.7 |
COM-PAC 19 vs Com-Pac Eclipse: the short version
- The Com-Pac Eclipse is the larger boat at 21.3 ft6.50 m LOA versus 20.1 ft6.12 m for the COM-PAC 19.
- The Com-Pac Eclipse is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the COM-PAC 19 carries the more powerful rig (15.4 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The COM-PAC 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the COM-PAC 19 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.