Com-Pac 23 vs Com-Pac Eclipse
How do the Com-Pac 23 and Com-Pac Eclipse compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac 23 | Com-Pac 23 | Com-Pac Eclipse | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.8 ft6.93 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 20.2 ft6.15 m | 18.1 ft5.51 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.39 m | 7.3 ft2.23 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.69 m | 5.2 ft1.57 m |
| Displacement | 2,900 lb1,315 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Ballast | 1,340 lb608 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | 206 ft²19.1 m² | 158 ft²14.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.21 | 14.94 |
| Displacement / Length | 158 | 166 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.8 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.7 |
Com-Pac 23 vs Com-Pac Eclipse: the short version
- The Com-Pac 23 is the larger boat at 22.8 ft6.93 m LOA versus 21.3 ft6.50 m for the Com-Pac Eclipse.
- The Com-Pac 23 is heavier, displacing about 32% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-Pac 23 carries the more powerful rig (16.2 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac 23 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.