Comfort 30 vs International 210
How do the Comfort 30 and International 210 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Comfort 30 | Comfort 30 | International 210 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.09 m | 29.8 ft9.09 m |
| Waterline length | 23.2 ft7.07 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 9.9 ft3.03 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 7,055 lb3,200 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Ballast | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 1,145 lb519 kg |
| Sail area | 635 ft²59.0 m² | 285 ft²26.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 27.62 | 26.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 252 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.3 | 13.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.07 | 1.77 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €13,000 | — |
Comfort 30 vs International 210: the short version
- The Comfort 30 and International 210 are close in length (29.8 ft9.09 m vs 29.8 ft9.09 m ).
- The Comfort 30 is heavier, displacing about 207% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Comfort 30 carries the more powerful rig (27.6 vs 26.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Comfort 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the International 210 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.