International 210 vs Pearson 303
How do the International 210 and Pearson 303 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
International 210 | International 210 | Pearson 303 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.09 m | 30.3 ft9.23 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 25.4 ft7.73 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 10.9 ft3.33 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 2,300 lb1,043 kg | 10,100 lb4,581 kg |
| Ballast | 1,145 lb519 kg | 3,500 lb1,588 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 459 ft²42.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.17 | 15.72 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 276 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.7 | 24.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.7 |
International 210 vs Pearson 303: the short version
- The International 210 and Pearson 303 are close in length (29.8 ft9.09 m vs 30.3 ft9.23 m ).
- The Pearson 303 is heavier, displacing about 339% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the International 210 carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 15.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson 303 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the International 210 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.