Ericson 29 vs Ericson 36
How do the Ericson 29 and Ericson 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 29 
Ericson 36 | Ericson 29 | Ericson 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.6 ft8.71 m | 35.6 ft10.84 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 8,500 lb3,856 kg | 11,600 lb5,262 kg |
| Ballast | 3,900 lb1,769 kg | 5,230 lb2,372 kg |
| Sail area | 407 ft²37.8 m² | 598 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.64 | 18.67 |
| Displacement / Length | 356 | 212 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.3 | 21.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.81 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 7.2 |
Ericson 29 vs Ericson 36: the short version
- The Ericson 36 is the larger boat at 35.6 ft10.84 m LOA versus 28.6 ft8.71 m for the Ericson 29.
- The Ericson 36 is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 36 carries the more powerful rig (18.7 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 29 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.