Etap 22i vs Etap 23i
How do the Etap 22i and Etap 23i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i | Etap 22i | Etap 23i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.4 ft6.84 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 19.0 ft5.80 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 4.8 ft1.46 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 3,306 lb1,500 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 1,036 lb470 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 205 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | 14.78 |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 214 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 15.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.19 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.8 |
Etap 22i vs Etap 23i: the short version
- The Etap 22i and Etap 23i are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.4 ft6.84 m ).
- The Etap 23i is heavier, displacing about 54% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 22i carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 23i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 23i rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.