Etap 22i vs Fabola Scanper
How do the Etap 22i and Fabola Scanper compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i | Etap 22i | Fabola Scanper | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.2 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 2,976 lb1,350 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 1,499 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 253 ft²23.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | 19.57 |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 174 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 13.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €1,200 |
Etap 22i vs Fabola Scanper: the short version
- The Etap 22i and Fabola Scanper are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.2 ft6.78 m ).
- The Fabola Scanper is heavier, displacing about 38% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fabola Scanper carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Fabola Scanper scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Fabola Scanper rates better for offshore work (2.28 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.