Fantasia 27 vs Finn Express 83
How do the Fantasia 27 and Finn Express 83 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fantasia 27 
Finn Express 83 | Fantasia 27 | Finn Express 83 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 21.5 ft6.55 m | 22.6 ft6.90 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.88 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 5,027 lb2,280 kg | 4,740 lb2,150 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 1,940 lb880 kg |
| Sail area | 282 ft²26.2 m² | 323 ft²30.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.38 | 18.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 182 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 15.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.21 | 2.19 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | — | €4,300 |
Fantasia 27 vs Finn Express 83: the short version
- The Fantasia 27 and Finn Express 83 are close in length (27.2 ft8.30 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Finn Express 83 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Fantasia 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Finn Express 83 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.