Fantasia 27 vs Maxi Fenix
How do the Fantasia 27 and Maxi Fenix compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fantasia 27 
Maxi Fenix | Fantasia 27 | Maxi Fenix | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Waterline length | 21.5 ft6.55 m | 24.3 ft7.40 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.88 m | 9.3 ft2.85 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 5,027 lb2,280 kg | 6,173 lb2,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 2,150 lb975 kg |
| Sail area | 282 ft²26.2 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.38 | 21.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 19.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.21 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | — | €9,500 |
Fantasia 27 vs Maxi Fenix: the short version
- The Fantasia 27 and Maxi Fenix are close in length (27.2 ft8.30 m vs 27.2 ft8.30 m ).
- The Maxi Fenix is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Fenix carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi Fenix scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi Fenix rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.