Hallberg-Rassy 26 vs Tur 80
How do the Hallberg-Rassy 26 and Tur 80 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hallberg-Rassy 26 | Hallberg-Rassy 26 | Tur 80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.95 m | 26.1 ft7.96 m |
| Waterline length | 20.7 ft6.30 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.68 m | 8.2 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 3.5 ft1.08 m |
| Displacement | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 5,071 lb2,300 kg |
| Ballast | 2,425 lb1,100 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 398 ft²37.0 m² | 366 ft²34.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.41 | 19.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 279 | 228 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 20.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €10,000 | €3,100 |
Hallberg-Rassy 26 vs Tur 80: the short version
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 and Tur 80 are close in length (26.1 ft7.95 m vs 26.1 ft7.96 m ).
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hallberg-Rassy 26 carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 19.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hallberg-Rassy 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tur 80 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.