Maxi Magic vs Tur 80
How do the Maxi Magic and Tur 80 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi Magic | Maxi Magic | Tur 80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.97 m | 26.1 ft7.96 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 8.2 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 3.5 ft1.08 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 5,071 lb2,300 kg |
| Ballast | 1,543 lb700 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 366 ft²34.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 19.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 228 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 20.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €9,000 | €3,100 |
Maxi Magic vs Tur 80: the short version
- The Maxi Magic and Tur 80 are close in length (26.1 ft7.97 m vs 26.1 ft7.96 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Magic carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 19.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tur 80 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tur 80 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.