Havsfidra vs Marieholm S20
How do the Havsfidra and Marieholm S20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Havsfidra | Havsfidra | Marieholm S20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 17.2 ft5.25 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.20 m | 3.0 ft0.90 m |
| Displacement | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 2,756 lb1,250 kg |
| Ballast | 1,323 lb600 kg | 882 lb400 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 180 ft²16.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.19 | 14.65 |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 241 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 17.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.6 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | €1,100 |
Havsfidra vs Marieholm S20: the short version
- The Havsfidra and Marieholm S20 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Havsfidra is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marieholm S20 carries the more powerful rig (14.7 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Havsfidra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Havsfidra rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.