Havsfidra vs Triss Magnum
How do the Havsfidra and Triss Magnum compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Havsfidra | Havsfidra | Triss Magnum | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 16.4 ft5.00 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.20 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 2,535 lb1,150 kg |
| Ballast | 1,323 lb600 kg | 1,235 lb560 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 248 ft²23.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.19 | 21.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 3007 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 22.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 3.6 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | €1,000 |
Havsfidra vs Triss Magnum: the short version
- The Havsfidra and Triss Magnum are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Havsfidra is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Triss Magnum carries the more powerful rig (21.3 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Triss Magnum scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Havsfidra rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.