Hinterhoeller F3 vs Nonsuch 36
How do the Hinterhoeller F3 and Nonsuch 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hinterhoeller F3 | Hinterhoeller F3 | Nonsuch 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.4 ft11.08 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 29.5 ft8.99 m | 33.8 ft10.29 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 12.7 ft3.86 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 5,730 lb2,599 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Sail area | 630 ft²58.5 m² | 742 ft²68.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.50 | 17.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 190 | 197 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 25.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.13 | 1.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.8 |
Hinterhoeller F3 vs Nonsuch 36: the short version
- The Hinterhoeller F3 and Nonsuch 36 are close in length (36.4 ft11.08 m vs 36.0 ft10.97 m ).
- The Nonsuch 36 is heavier, displacing about 56% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hinterhoeller F3 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nonsuch 36 rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.