Invader 36 vs Nonsuch 36
How do the Invader 36 and Nonsuch 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Invader 36 | Invader 36 | Nonsuch 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.8 ft10.90 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.39 m | 33.8 ft10.29 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 12.7 ft3.86 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 10,550 lb4,785 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 3,800 lb1,724 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Sail area | 504 ft²46.8 m² | 742 ft²68.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.76 | 17.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 330 | 197 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.8 | 25.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.67 | 1.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.8 |
Invader 36 vs Nonsuch 36: the short version
- The Invader 36 and Nonsuch 36 are close in length (35.8 ft10.90 m vs 36.0 ft10.97 m ).
- The Nonsuch 36 is heavier, displacing about 61% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 36 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Invader 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Invader 36 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 1.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.