Maxi Magic vs Maxi Racer
How do the Maxi Magic and Maxi Racer compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi Magic | Maxi Magic | Maxi Racer | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.97 m | 26.1 ft7.97 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 23.3 ft7.10 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.1 ft2.76 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 3,968 lb1,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,543 lb700 kg | 1,653 lb750 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 409 ft²38.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 26.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 140 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 13.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.29 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €9,000 | €4,500 |
Maxi Magic vs Maxi Racer: the short version
- The Maxi Magic and Maxi Racer are close in length (26.1 ft7.97 m vs 26.1 ft7.97 m ).
- The Maxi Magic is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Racer carries the more powerful rig (26.1 vs 22.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi Magic scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi Magic rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.29).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.