Newport 16 vs Sirocco 15
How do the Newport 16 and Sirocco 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Newport 16 
Sirocco 15 | Newport 16 | Sirocco 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.6 ft4.75 m | 15.3 ft4.67 m |
| Waterline length | 13.7 ft4.17 m | 14.3 ft4.34 m |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 750 lb340 kg | 470 lb213 kg |
| Ballast | 250 lb113 kg | 75 lb34 kg |
| Sail area | 143 ft²13.3 m² | 147 ft²13.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 27.72 | 38.91 |
| Displacement / Length | 131 | 73 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.1 | 4.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.75 | 3.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Newport 16 vs Sirocco 15: the short version
- The Newport 16 and Sirocco 15 are close in length (15.6 ft4.75 m vs 15.3 ft4.67 m ).
- The Newport 16 is heavier, displacing about 60% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sirocco 15 carries the more powerful rig (38.9 vs 27.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Newport 16 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Newport 16 rates better for offshore work (2.75 vs 3.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.