Herreshoff Bull's Eye vs Newport 16
How do the Herreshoff Bull's Eye and Newport 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Herreshoff Bull's Eye 
Newport 16 | Herreshoff Bull's Eye | Newport 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.7 ft4.79 m | 15.6 ft4.75 m |
| Waterline length | 12.5 ft3.82 m | 13.7 ft4.17 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Draft | 2.4 ft0.74 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 1,350 lb612 kg | 750 lb340 kg |
| Ballast | 750 lb340 kg | 250 lb113 kg |
| Sail area | 155 ft²14.4 m² | 143 ft²13.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.30 | 27.72 |
| Displacement / Length | 307 | 131 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.8 | 7.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.7 | 5.0 |
Herreshoff Bull's Eye vs Newport 16: the short version
- The Herreshoff Bull's Eye and Newport 16 are close in length (15.7 ft4.79 m vs 15.6 ft4.75 m ).
- The Herreshoff Bull's Eye is heavier, displacing about 80% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Newport 16 carries the more powerful rig (27.7 vs 20.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Herreshoff Bull's Eye scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Herreshoff Bull's Eye rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.75).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.