Northwind 29 vs Prospect 900
How do the Northwind 29 and Prospect 900 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Northwind 29 
Prospect 900 | Northwind 29 | Prospect 900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.8 ft8.78 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 6,600 lb2,994 kg | 7,275 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 3,180 lb1,442 kg | 3,086 lb1,400 kg |
| Sail area | 374 ft²34.7 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.01 | 12.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 277 | 288 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 24.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Northwind 29 vs Prospect 900: the short version
- The Northwind 29 and Prospect 900 are close in length (28.8 ft8.78 m vs 28.8 ft8.79 m ).
- The Prospect 900 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Northwind 29 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Prospect 900 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Prospect 900 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.