Chance 32/28 vs Northwind 29
How do the Chance 32/28 and Northwind 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Chance 32/28 
Northwind 29 | Chance 32/28 | Northwind 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.1 ft9.78 m | 28.8 ft8.78 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 9.2 ft2.79 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.75 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Displacement | 12,025 lb5,454 kg | 6,600 lb2,994 kg |
| Ballast | 4,680 lb2,123 kg | 3,180 lb1,442 kg |
| Sail area | 459 ft²42.6 m² | 374 ft²34.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.99 | 17.01 |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 277 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.8 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.75 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 6.3 |
Chance 32/28 vs Northwind 29: the short version
- The Chance 32/28 is the larger boat at 32.1 ft9.78 m LOA versus 28.8 ft8.78 m for the Northwind 29.
- The Chance 32/28 is heavier, displacing about 82% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Northwind 29 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Chance 32/28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Chance 32/28 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.