Ontario 32 vs Viking 34
How do the Ontario 32 and Viking 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ontario 32 
Viking 34 | Ontario 32 | Viking 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 33.6 ft10.24 m |
| Waterline length | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 27.2 ft8.28 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 9,800 lb4,445 kg | 8,900 lb4,037 kg |
| Ballast | 3,977 lb1,804 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Sail area | 481 ft²44.7 m² | 540 ft²50.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.81 | 20.12 |
| Displacement / Length | 235 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.1 | 22.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.0 |
Ontario 32 vs Viking 34: the short version
- The Viking 34 is the larger boat at 33.6 ft10.24 m LOA versus 32.0 ft9.75 m for the Ontario 32.
- The Ontario 32 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Viking 34 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Viking 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Viking 34 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.