Santana 30/30 vs Santana 39
How do the Santana 30/30 and Santana 39 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Santana 30/30 | Santana 30/30 | Santana 39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Waterline length | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.12 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 18,000 lb8,165 kg |
| Ballast | 2,310 lb1,048 kg | 6,600 lb2,994 kg |
| Sail area | 440 ft²40.9 m² | 686 ft²63.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.21 | 15.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 177 | 245 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.9 | 30.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 7.6 |
Santana 30/30 vs Santana 39: the short version
- The Santana 39 is the larger boat at 39.0 ft11.89 m LOA versus 29.9 ft9.12 m for the Santana 30/30.
- The Santana 39 is heavier, displacing about 177% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Santana 30/30 carries the more powerful rig (20.2 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 39 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.