Santana 30/30 vs Schock 23
How do the Santana 30/30 and Schock 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Santana 30/30 
Schock 23 | Santana 30/30 | Schock 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.12 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Ballast | 2,310 lb1,048 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 440 ft²40.9 m² | 267 ft²24.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.21 | 21.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 177 | 142 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.9 | 11.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 2.41 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 6.1 |
Santana 30/30 vs Schock 23: the short version
- The Santana 30/30 is the larger boat at 29.9 ft9.12 m LOA versus 23.3 ft7.11 m for the Schock 23.
- The Santana 30/30 is heavier, displacing about 132% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Schock 23 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 20.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 30/30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 30/30 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.41).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.