Swan 44 Frers vs Swan 45
How do the Swan 44 Frers and Swan 45 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 44 Frers 
Swan 45 | Swan 44 Frers | Swan 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 45.1 ft13.75 m | 45.4 ft13.83 m |
| Waterline length | 34.6 ft10.56 m | 39.6 ft12.07 m |
| Beam | 13.7 ft4.18 m | 12.8 ft3.91 m |
| Draft | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Displacement | 24,251 lb11,000 kg | 21,716 lb9,850 kg |
| Ballast | 7,700 lb3,493 kg | 8,620 lb3,910 kg |
| Sail area | 890 ft²82.7 m² | 1,411 ft²131.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.00 | 29.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 260 | 156 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.4 | 27.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.89 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 8.4 |
Swan 44 Frers vs Swan 45: the short version
- The Swan 44 Frers and Swan 45 are close in length (45.1 ft13.75 m vs 45.4 ft13.83 m ).
- The Swan 44 Frers is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 45 carries the more powerful rig (29.0 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 44 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 45 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.89).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.