Swan 44 Frers vs Swan 48 Frers
How do the Swan 44 Frers and Swan 48 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 44 Frers 
Swan 48 Frers | Swan 44 Frers | Swan 48 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 45.1 ft13.75 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 34.6 ft10.56 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Beam | 13.7 ft4.18 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Draft | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 7.8 ft2.38 m |
| Displacement | 24,251 lb11,000 kg | 31,526 lb14,300 kg |
| Ballast | 7,700 lb3,493 kg | 12,100 lb5,488 kg |
| Sail area | 890 ft²82.7 m² | 1,142 ft²106.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.00 | 18.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 260 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.4 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.89 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 8.6 |
Swan 44 Frers vs Swan 48 Frers: the short version
- The Swan 44 Frers is the larger boat at 45.1 ft13.75 m LOA versus 41.0 ft12.50 m for the Swan 48 Frers.
- The Swan 48 Frers is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 48 Frers carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 48 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 48 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 1.89).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.