Swan 441 vs Tayana 37
How do the Swan 441 and Tayana 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 441 
Tayana 37 | Swan 441 | Tayana 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.8 ft11.20 m | 36.7 ft11.18 m |
| Waterline length | 36.8 ft11.20 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 13.3 ft4.06 m | 11.6 ft3.54 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 24,692 lb11,200 kg | 22,500 lb10,206 kg |
| Ballast | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Sail area | 1,248 ft²115.9 m² | 846 ft²78.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.55 | 16.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 222 | 337 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.0 | 40.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 7.5 |
Swan 441 vs Tayana 37: the short version
- The Swan 441 and Tayana 37 are close in length (36.8 ft11.20 m vs 36.7 ft11.18 m ).
- The Swan 441 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 441 carries the more powerful rig (23.5 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tayana 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tayana 37 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.