Alacrity 19 vs Hurley 18
How do the Alacrity 19 and Hurley 18 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alacrity 19 | Alacrity 19 | Hurley 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 18.5 ft5.63 m |
| Waterline length | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 14.1 ft4.30 m |
| Beam | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 6.5 ft1.99 m |
| Draft | 1.8 ft0.55 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 1,500 lb680 kg | 2,337 lb1,060 kg |
| Ballast | 480 lb218 kg | 1,001 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 158 ft²14.7 m² | 180 ft²16.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.29 | 16.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 136 | 371 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 19.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 1.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.0 |
| Average used price | — | €2,000 |
Alacrity 19 vs Hurley 18: the short version
- The Alacrity 19 and Hurley 18 are close in length (18.5 ft5.64 m vs 18.5 ft5.63 m ).
- The Hurley 18 is heavier, displacing about 56% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Alacrity 19 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hurley 18 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hurley 18 rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.