Alacrity 19 vs Sandpiper 565
How do the Alacrity 19 and Sandpiper 565 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alacrity 19 
Sandpiper 565 | Alacrity 19 | Sandpiper 565 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 18.5 ft5.64 m |
| Waterline length | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Beam | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 1.8 ft0.55 m | 2.9 ft0.88 m |
| Displacement | 1,500 lb680 kg | 1,200 lb544 kg |
| Ballast | 480 lb218 kg | 300 lb136 kg |
| Sail area | 158 ft²14.7 m² | 154 ft²14.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.29 | 21.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 136 | 159 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.1 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.2 |
Alacrity 19 vs Sandpiper 565: the short version
- The Alacrity 19 and Sandpiper 565 are close in length (18.5 ft5.64 m vs 18.5 ft5.64 m ).
- The Alacrity 19 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sandpiper 565 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 19.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alacrity 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alacrity 19 rates better for offshore work (2.42 vs 2.67).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.