Alberg 22 vs Alberg 29
How do the Alberg 22 and Alberg 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 22 
Alberg 29 | Alberg 22 | Alberg 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 29.3 ft8.92 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.94 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 9,000 lb4,082 kg |
| Ballast | 1,540 lb699 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 235 ft²21.8 m² | 417 ft²38.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.31 | 15.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 365 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 29.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.3 |
Alberg 22 vs Alberg 29: the short version
- The Alberg 29 is the larger boat at 29.3 ft8.92 m LOA versus 22.0 ft6.71 m for the Alberg 22.
- The Alberg 29 is heavier, displacing about 181% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Alberg 22 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 29 rates better for offshore work (1.76 vs 1.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.