Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter vs Blue Water 24
How do the Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter and Blue Water 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter | Blue Water 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 8.6 ft2.62 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.1 ft1.24 m |
| Displacement | 8,900 lb4,037 kg | 7,950 lb3,606 kg |
| Ballast | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 410 ft²38.1 m² | 276 ft²25.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.27 | 11.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 497 | 466 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 33.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.74 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.9 |
Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter vs Blue Water 24: the short version
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter and Blue Water 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter carries the more powerful rig (15.3 vs 11.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Blue Water 24 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.74).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.