Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter vs Bridges Point 24
How do the Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter and Bridges Point 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter | Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter | Bridges Point 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 18.7 ft5.69 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.4 ft1.04 m |
| Displacement | 8,900 lb4,037 kg | 3,944 lb1,789 kg |
| Ballast | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Sail area | 410 ft²38.1 m² | 278 ft²25.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.27 | 17.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 497 | 271 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 19.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.74 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.8 |
Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter vs Bridges Point 24: the short version
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter and Bridges Point 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter is heavier, displacing about 126% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bridges Point 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 15.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.