Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter vs Captiva 240
How do the Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter and Captiva 240 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter | Captiva 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 8,900 lb4,037 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 410 ft²38.1 m² | 280 ft²26.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.27 | 24.99 |
| Displacement / Length | 497 | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.8 | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.74 | 2.44 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter vs Captiva 240: the short version
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter and Captiva 240 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter is heavier, displacing about 271% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Captiva 240 carries the more powerful rig (25.0 vs 15.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Aquarius 24 Pilot Cutter rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.