Fantasia 27 vs Sun Odyssey 349
How do the Fantasia 27 and Sun Odyssey 349 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Fantasia 27 
Sun Odyssey 349 | Fantasia 27 | Sun Odyssey 349 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 33.9 ft10.34 m |
| Waterline length | 21.5 ft6.55 m | 30.8 ft9.40 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.88 m | 11.3 ft3.44 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 5,027 lb2,280 kg | 11,795 lb5,350 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 3,483 lb1,580 kg |
| Sail area | 282 ft²26.2 m² | 547 ft²50.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.38 | 16.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 226 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 22.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.21 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.4 |
Fantasia 27 vs Sun Odyssey 349: the short version
- The Sun Odyssey 349 is the larger boat at 33.9 ft10.34 m LOA versus 27.2 ft8.30 m for the Fantasia 27.
- The Sun Odyssey 349 is heavier, displacing about 135% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sun Odyssey 349 carries the more powerful rig (16.9 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sun Odyssey 349 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sun Odyssey 349 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.