Herreshoff Bull's Eye vs New York 30
How do the Herreshoff Bull's Eye and New York 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Herreshoff Bull's Eye Herreshoff Manufacturing Company · 1914 
New York 30 Herreshoff Manufacturing Company · 1905 | Herreshoff Bull's Eye | New York 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.7 ft4.79 m | 43.0 ft13.11 m |
| Waterline length | 12.5 ft3.82 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 2.4 ft0.74 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 1,350 lb612 kg | 17,782 lb8,066 kg |
| Ballast | 750 lb340 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Sail area | 155 ft²14.4 m² | 1,057 ft²98.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.30 | 24.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 307 | 294 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.8 | 50.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 1.23 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.7 | 7.3 |
Herreshoff Bull's Eye vs New York 30: the short version
- The New York 30 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.11 m LOA versus 15.7 ft4.79 m for the Herreshoff Bull's Eye.
- The New York 30 is heavier, displacing about 1217% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the New York 30 carries the more powerful rig (24.8 vs 20.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The New York 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the New York 30 rates better for offshore work (1.23 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.